Inception Date
  May 19, 1995

Total Fund Assets
  $221.46 Million  (6/30/18)

Expense Ratio

Benchmark Index
  ICE BofA ML HY Master II


Overall Morningstar™ rating out of 575 High Yield Bond funds as of 6/30/18 (derived from a weighted average of the fund’s three-, five-, and ten-year risk adjusted return measure).




The Morningstar™ Risk vs Category rating is an assessment of the variations in a fund’s monthly returns, with an emphasis on downside variations, in comparison to the 575 funds in the High Yield Bond category, as of 6/30/18.

High Yield Fund News

“Outlook on High Yield Markets”

Conservative positioning could be key — We now believe the high yield market offers more risk than reward. While we are not forecasting an imminent recession, numerous factors could result in wider credit spreads down the road.

Income Investing Strategies to Preserve Principal

Using techniques identified in the article, a few income funds are highlighted (including the Buffalo High Yield Fund) that pay regular dividends and preserved investors’ capital during the period before and through the Great Recession.


Our team brings many years of credit research experience to the bond market. We are proud to have provided our shareholders with what we believe is a conservative approach to investing in high yield bonds since 1995.

~ Jeff Sitzmann, Portfolio Manager


It's easy to open an account or add to your existing account.

Select the platform of your choice by clicking one of the links below:

  BUFFALO FUNDS (direct)




Buffalo Funds are also available on hundreds of other platforms.

Investment Strategy

The investment objective of the Buffalo High Yield Fund is primarily current income, with long-term growth of capital as a secondary objective. The High Yield Fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets in higher-yielding, higher-risk debt securities rated below investment grade by the major rating agencies (or in similar unrated securities), commonly known as “junk bonds”. Debt securities can include fixed and floating rate bonds as well as bank debt and convertible debt securities.

While the Fund maintains flexibility to invest in bonds of varying maturities, the Fund generally holds bonds with intermediate-term maturities. With respect to the remaining 20% of the Fund’s net assets, the Fund may invest in investment grade debt securities, U.S. Treasury Securities (typically with maturities of 60 days or less), money market funds, and equity investments, including dividend paying stocks and convertible preferred stocks.

Download our recent white paper


Performance (%)

As of 6/30/183 MOYTD1 YR3 YR5 YR10 YR15 YRSince Inception
Buffalo High Yield Fund0.51-
  ICE BofA Merrill Lynch HY Master II1.000.082.535.555.518.037.667.20
  Lipper High Yield Bond Funds Index0.71-0.142.544.494.846.676.605.91
  Morningstar High Yield Bond0.56-
As of 6/30/183 MOYTD1 YR3 YR5 YR10 YR15 YRSince Inception
Buffalo High Yield Fund0.51-
  ICE BofA Merrill Lynch HY Master II1.000.082.535.555.518.037.667.20
  Lipper High Yield Bond Funds Index0.71-0.142.544.494.846.676.605.91
  Morningstar High Yield Bond0.56-
YearBuffalo High Yield FundICE BofA Merrill Lynch HY Master II IndexMorningstar High Yield Bond Category
(As of 6/30/18)

vs ICE BofA Merrill Lynch HY Master II
Upside Capture52.43
Downside Capture49.22
Sharpe Ratio0.85

Performance data quoted represents past performance; past performance does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance of the fund may be lower of higher than the performance quoted and can be obtained here. Performance is annualized for periods greater than 1 year. Each Morningstar category average represents a universe of funds with similar objectives.

Growth of $10k

This chart illustrates the performance of a hypothetical $10,000 investment made in the Fund on the Inception Date. Assumes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. This chart does not imply future performance.


(As of 6/30/18)

# of Holdings140
3-Yr Annualized Turnover Ratio36.56%
Average Duration3.37 years
Average Maturity5.83 years
30-day SEC Yield4.18%
Name of Holding% of Net Assets
Lions Gate Entertainment (1.250%, 4/15/18)2.17%
MacDonald Dettwiler (Term Loan B, 7/5/24)2.17%
Akorn (Term Loan B, 4/16/21)2.12%
Quad Graphics (7.000%, 5/1/22)1.80%
Consolidated Communications (6.500%, 10/1/22)1.73%
Triumph Group (4.875%, 4/1/21)1.70%
FTI Consulting (6.000%, 11/15/22)1.61%
Phillips Van Heusen (7.750%, 11/15/23)1.60%
Brunswick (7.375%, 9/1/23)1.52%
Wildhorse Resource Dev (6.875%, 2/1/25)1.52%
View Full Holdings

As of 3/31/18. Top 10 Holdings for the quarter are not disclosed until 60 days after quarter end. Those listed are for the previous quarter. Fund holdings are subject to change and are not recommendations to buy or sell any securities.

Buffalo publishes this listing of securities held as of the most recent calendar-quarter end, with a 30 or 60 day lag depending on the portfolio. Buffalo may exclude any portion of holdings from publication when deemed in the best interest of the portfolio.

The portfolio data and its presentation here may differ from the complete schedules of investments in regulatory filings due to differing accounting and reporting requirements.

Percentage of Net Assets as of 6/30/18. Security weightings are subject to change and are not recommendations to buy or sell any securities.
Sector Allocation may not equal 100% due to rounding.

Percentages of Total Assets as of 6/30/18. Allocation percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.

Duration Breakout (%)*
7-10 Years0.74
5-7 Years11.24
3-5 Years39.44
1-3 Years20.90
0-1 Years7.16
*Excludes Bank Loans and Converts.
Quality Breakout (%)
Non Rated8.25

Standard & Poor’s is the rating source for the Quality Breakout Table. A credit rating is an assessment provided by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO), such as Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s. The firm evaluates the of credit worthiness of an issuer with respect to debt obligations, including specific securities, money market instruments, or other bonds. Ratings are measured on a scale that generally ranges from AAA (highest grade) to D (lowest grade); ratings are subject to change without notice. Not Rated (NR) indicates that the debtor was not rated by an NRSRO and should not be interpreted as indicating low quality. All ratings are as of 9/30/17.


Commentary for Q2 2018   (As of 6/30/18)


(As of 3/31/18) — After producing positive returns in the 4th quarter of 2017, the U.S. high yield sector reversed course generating negative performance in the 1st quarter of 2018, with bond prices retreating in February and March after reaching all-time peak levels in January.

The market’s performance was driven by:

  • continued, albeit modest, economic growth of the U.S. gross domestic product;
  • a healthy labor market with additional jobs added and the unemployment rate near cycle lows;
  • the Federal Reserve maintaining a gradual pace of increasing interest rates and timing of plans to reduce their balance sheet;
  • the equity market indexes trading off from record levels and increased level market volatility (as measured by the Cboe Volatility Index);
  • concerns regarding disruptions in international trade on proposals for tariffs on selected imported products;
  • and evolving geopolitical landscape and risks.

Uncertain market conditions and rising short-term interest rates encouraged investors to sell risky assets. The 10-year Treasury bond experienced a -2.40% return during the quarter while the S&P 500 stock index declined 0.76%. The rising interest rate environment and increased market volatility contributed to cash outflows for the non-investment grade sector during the quarter of about $19.2 billion compared to outflows of $8.2 billion in the previous year-over-year quarter ending March 31, 2017, according to data from JP Morgan. The high yield new issuance calendar of $72.7 billion during the quarter was flat sequentially ($72.5 billion in the 4th quarter of 2017) and down year-over-year ($98.7 billion in the 1st quarter of 2017).

During the 1st quarter of 2018, the 10-year Treasury bond yield increased by 34 basis points (bps) from 2.40% to 2.74%. The increase in Treasury yields mirrored the returns of investment grade and BBB crossover issues, which are sensitive to movement in interest rates, while lower rated CCC-rated bonds had slightly positive returns (primarily due to 800 bps of Treasury spread insulating their sensitivity to interest rate movements). This led to relative outperformance in lower quality fixed income products in 1Q18. According to data from JP Morgan, the BB-rated segment returned -1.74%, underperforming both the B-rated segment return of -0.14% and the CCC-rated segment return of +0.74% during the period. The Fund was underexposed to the CCC sector with a weighting of about 2% compared to the JP Morgan CCC weighting of 12%.

According to data from JP Morgan, the U.S. high yield market’s spread-to-worst for the period ended 3/31/18 was 410 bps, 6 bps wider from the preceding quarter of 2017 and 206 bps below its 20-year historical average of 616 bps. The yield-to-worst for the high yield market at quarter end was 6.56%, below the 9.10% 20-year average, and above the yield of 6.10% at the end of 2017.


(As of 3/31/18) — The Buffalo High Yield Fund retreated 0.54% for the quarter ending March 31, 2018, but outperformed the ICE BofA Merrill Lynch High Yield Master II Index (the “Index”) by 37 bps, which declined 0.91% during the period. The Fund also outperformed the Lipper High Yield Bond Funds Index and Morningstar High Yield Bond Group by 31 bps and 43 bps, respectively.

The Fund’s cash balance at the end of the 1st quarter was 4.3% of Fund assets, decreased 90 bps from the 4th quarter of 2017, as new security purchases exceeded the holdings in the Fund that were either called by the issuers or sold outright, events that will raise the Funds cash balance. The Fund’s composition by asset class at quarter end was as follows:

Fund Composition by Asset Class
Straight Corporates65.5%63.6%62.9%60.5%62.6%
Bank Loans11.5%12.5%13.9%18.6%17.8%
Preferred Stock0.0%0.0%1.0%1.5%0.5%
Convertible Preferred1.6%0.9%0.9%1.2%0.5%
Common Stocks0.0%0.5%0.6%0.7%0.7%
Approximate Rate and Contribution of Return from the Fund’s Various Asset Classes in Q3 ‘17
Unweighted ReturnContribution to Return
Straight Corporates0.7%0.44%
Bank Loans1.2%0.22%
Preferred Stock-2.2%-0.02%
Convertible Preferred-7.6%-0.07%
Common Stocks0.5%0.00%

As shown in the table above, all of the Fund’s asset classes with the exception of Bank Loans produced negative returns. The Fund’s Bank Loans, Straight Corporates, and Convertible Preferred outperformed the Index total return, while Convertibles, Preferred Stock, and Common Stocks underperformed the Index total return.

Specific securities that contributed most positively to performance include PRA Group 3.50% convertible bonds, The Medicines Co. 2.75% convertible bonds, and Envestnet 1.75% convertible bonds. PRA advanced on better than expected earnings and improved underlying fundamentals. The Medicines Co. improved on favorable progress on drug study enrollments, asset sales, and company restructuring. Envestnet rose on financial results exceeding expectations.

Specific securities that detracted most from performance include Lions Gate 1.25% convertible bonds, Lions Gate common stock, and Greenbrier Cos. convertible bonds. The Lions Gate securities were down on guidance from management that earnings growth in the near term will be limited due to investment content for Starz and the timing of film releases. Greenbrier declined on earnings coming in below expectations and the sluggish environment for railcar orders.


(As of 3/31/18) — The market for high yield securities started to show signs of weariness as yields/spreads bounced around cycle lows, while yields have risen slightly as short-term interest rates have increased. A growing economy with modest inflation has created a favorable environment for risky assets. However, market participants are becoming increasingly concerned about potential trade wars with China and physical confrontations with North Korea and Russia/Syria.

The U.S. high yield default rate of 2.21% was up 93 bps year-to-date and up 31 bps from 1.90% in March 2017, but still below the 3.0-3.5% long-term average. On the positive side, the slowdown in new issuance activity has reduced the supply of bonds available for purchase, which has helped support bid levels.

We continue to be concerned about:

  • the Federal Reserve taking a more aggressive tightening policy stance;
  • inflation growth acceleration;
  • geopolitical issues such as North Korea or tensions in the Middle East escalating;
  • and increasing protectionism efforts from the White House.

Given that we may be in the later stages of the economic cycle, we still find ourselves confronted with relatively low spread and yield levels historically. As a result, we are managing the Fund cautiously yet actively. We ended the quarter with 145 investment positions compared to the previous quarter’s level of 144 positions (excluding cash).

We are managing the Fund with a focus on higher-quality, non-investment grade issuers with defensive business models and manageable credit metrics, by our analysis. We will continue to deploy the Fund’s cash in opportunities that we believe offer the most appealing risk/reward trade-offs with a bias toward shorter durations and less levered credits. Additionally, we believe bank loans offer a compelling opportunity as they offer senior positioning in the capital structure and floating interest rates. Finally, we continue to look for opportunities in convertible bonds and preferreds selectively.

The opinions expressed are those of the Portfolio Manager(s) and are subject to change, are not guaranteed and should not be considered recommendations to buy or sell any security. Fund holdings and sector allocations are subject to change and are not recommendations to buy or sell any security. Diversification does not assure a profit, nor does it protect against a loss in a declining market. Earnings growth is not representative of the fund’s future performance.

Fundamental Approach

We get to know the companies we invest in and learn how they run their business.

Top-Down & Bottom-Up

We identify Top-Down broad, secular growth trends and search for companies from the Bottom-Up.

Proprietary Philosophy

We construct our portfolios based on our own proprietary investment strategy.

Disciplined Investing

Sticking to our disciplined investment strategy ensures we maintain a consistent, balanced approach.

Sign Up for Automatic Updates

Stay up-to-date with the most recent media coverage and press releases about the Buffalo Funds.


Terms of Use – Email lists are created for use by U.S. investment professionals only and are published strictly for informational purposes. Providing access to the content of these emails does not explicitly or implicitly constitute a solicitation of services or products of the Buffalo Funds, Kornitzer Capital Management, or any of their affiliates. The information contained in the emails is not intended for distribution to, or for use by, investment professionals in a jurisdiction where distribution or purchase is not authorized. The information contained in these emails is not appropriate for use by individual investors. By registering for any of these emails, you agree to Buffalo's terms and conditions and that you are qualified as an institutional investor or otherwise member of a registered broker/dealer, registered investment advisor, or investment consulting firm.


The Morningstar Rating™ for funds, or "star rating", is calculated for managed products (including mutual funds, variable annuity and variable life subaccounts, exchange-traded funds, closed-end funds, and separate accounts) with at least a three-year history. Exchange-traded funds and open-ended mutual funds are considered a single population for comparative purposes. It is calculated based on a Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Return measure that accounts for variation in a managed product's monthly excess performance, placing more emphasis on downward variations and rewarding consistent performance. The top 10% of products in each product category receive 5 stars, the next 22.5% receive 4 stars, the next 35% receive 3 stars, the next 22.5% receive 2 stars, and the bottom 10% receive 1 star. The Overall Morningstar Rating™ for a managed product is derived from a weighted average of the performance figures associated with its three-, five-, and 10-year (if applicable) Morningstar Rating™ metrics. The weights are: 100% three-year rating for 36-59 months of total returns, 60% five-year rating/40% three-year rating for 60-119 months of total returns, and 50% 10-year rating/30% five-year rating/20% three-year rating for 120 or more months of total returns. While the 10-year overall star rating formula seems to give the most weight to the 10-year period, the most recent three-year period actually has the greatest impact because it is included in all three rating periods.

The Buffalo High Yield Fund received 2 stars among 575 for the three-year, 3 stars among 484 for the five-year, and 4 stars among 321 High Yield Bond funds for the ten-year period ending 6/30/18.

In each Morningstar Category, the 10% of funds with the lowest measured risk are described as Low Risk, the next 22.5% Below Average, the middle 35% Average, the next 22.5% Above Average, and the top 10% High. Morningstar Risk is measured for up to three time periods (three, five, and 10 years). These separate measures are then weighted and averaged to produce an overall measure for the fund. Funds with less than three years of performance history are not rated.

©2018 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Bond ratings are grades given to bonds that indicates their credit quality as determined by a private independent rating service such as [Standard & Poor's or Moody’s, etc.]. The firm evaluates a bond issuer's financial strength, or its ability to pay a bond's principal and interest in a timely fashion. Ratings are expressed as letters ranging from 'AAA', which is the highest grade, to 'D', which is the lowest grade. Not Rated category includes holdings that are not rated by any rating agencies.